New York Court of Appeals, 1949

Banque Mellie Iran v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.

Banque Mellie Iran v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 19, 1949
87 N.E.2d 684; 299 N.Y. 790; 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1204 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Banque Mellie Iran v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: “ A federal question was. presented and necessarily passed upon by this court, viz: it was held that the provisions of Executive order No. 8389, as amended, and the rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto did not prevent the accrual or creation of the claim sued upon or render *791 such claim void, but merely prevented the payment of the claim until an appropriate federal license is obtained, and that the documents in evidence do not constitute such a license.” [See 299 N. Y. 139.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.