Calamia v. Goldsmith Bros.

New York Court of Appeals
Calamia v. Goldsmith Bros., 299 N.Y. 795 (N.Y. 1949)

Calamia v. Goldsmith Bros.

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: “The following question under the Constitution and laws of the United States was presented and necessarily passed upon: ‘ Whether Article 24-A of the General Business Law is inconsistent with the Miller-Tydings Amend*796ment to the Sherman Act (U. S. Code, tit. 15, § 1) if construed to permit suits by non-signatories and against non-signatories of “ fair trade ” contracts relating to commodities in interstate commerce ’. This Court held such construction of Article 24-A of the General Business Law of New York to be consistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States.” [See 299 N. Y. 636.]

Reference

Full Case Name
Eric Calamia, Individually and Trading under the Name of Reinhard Bros. v. Goldsmith Bros., Inc.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published