Iodice v. State
Iodice v. State
303 N.Y. 740; 103 N.E.2d 348; 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 1136
Iodice v. State
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye and Fuld, JJ. Froessel, J., dissents in the following memorandum : I dissent and vote for reversal for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion below (277 App. Div. 647, 654). Moreover, the evidence is uncontradicted that the natural flow of water was substantially increased by waters continuously diverted into the Delta Reservoir during July, August and through September 15, 1945, through the artificial Forestport feeder created and controlled by the State.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.