Claim of Salemi v. Farrand Optical Co.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Schneider v. Dunkirk Ice Cream (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Claim of Colangelo v. B. S. McCarey Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1961)
- Claim of Hartzell v. General Foods Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1959)
- Claim of Callaghan v. Sheffield Farms Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1957)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*839 Order of the Appellate Division reversed and decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. The evidence, while insufficient to sustain the board’s finding that claimant’s loss of vision in his left eye was caused by the accident of November 14, 1944, was nevertheless sufficient to sustain the further findings of the board that, on March 21, 1945, while claimant was workng for his employer on a grinder, a foreign body entered his left eye and that the loss of vision resulted therefrom. The failure to file a claim within two years does not bar claimant from receiving compensation as the medical treatment administered by the employer’s plant nurse in removing the foreign body from his eye constituted an advance payment within the meaning of section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. No opinion.
Concur: Lottghean, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Fboessel, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.