Schnepel v. Board of Education

New York Court of Appeals
Schnepel v. Board of Education, 302 N.Y. 94 (N.Y. 1951)
96 N.E.2d 617

Schnepel v. Board of Education

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Section 51 of the General Municipal Law authorizes actions by taxpayers against illegal acts of £< all officers, agents, commissioners and other persons acting, or who have acted, for and on behalf of any county, town, village or municipal corporation in this state ”. Section 2 of the same statute defines a municipal corporation ” as including ££ only a county, town, city and village.”

A board of education is not a municipal corporation within the meaning of the above provisions (see Hamilton v. Baker, *96243 N. Y. 578; Brooks v. Wyman, 246 N. Y. 534; Blackburn v. Clements, 297 N. Y. 971). Suggestion of a contrary viewpoint may be found in Lewis v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. (258 N. Y. 117) but, in our opinion, should not be accepted.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Loughban, Oh. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and and Froessel, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Thelma B. Schnepel v. Board of Education of the City of Rochester
Cited By
18 cases
Status
Published