New York Court of Appeals, 1951

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Casalino

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Casalino
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 4, 1951
302 N.Y. 560; 96 N.E.2d 445; 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 772

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Casalino

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as. follows: Order affirmed, with costs, tlpon this appeal there.' was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under a. Federal statute, namely, whether the judgment secured by the; plaintiff was dischargeable in bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Act (§ 57, subd. [j]; U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 93, subd. [j]). This; court held that the judgment of the plaintiff was dischargedl in bankruptcy. [See 301 N. Y. 715.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.