Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz

New York Court of Appeals
Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz, 304 N.Y. 590 (N.Y. 1952)
107 N.E.2d 82; 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 838

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz

Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. (Lutz v. Van Valkenburgh, 274 App. Div. 813), with costs in all courts. [See 304 N. Y. 95.]

Reference

Full Case Name
Marion L. Van Valkenburgh, and Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh v. Mary Lutz, Individually and as of William Lutz
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published