New York Court of Appeals, 1952

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 29, 1952
304 N.Y. 590; 107 N.E.2d 82; 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 838

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz

Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. (Lutz v. Van Valkenburgh, 274 App. Div. 813), with costs in all courts. [See 304 N. Y. 95.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.