Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
304 N.Y. 590; 107 N.E.2d 82; 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 838
Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
Opinion of the Court
Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. (Lutz v. Van Valkenburgh, 274 App. Div. 813), with costs in all courts. [See 304 N. Y. 95.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.