Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1955

Dicenzo v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp.

Dicenzo v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 11, 1955 · Concur: Conway
308 N.Y. 871; 126 N.E.2d 309

Dicenzo v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp.

Opinion

308 N.Y. 871 (1955)

Sam Dicenzo, as Administrator of The Estate of Albert Dicenzo, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
New York Shovel & Crane Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 25, 1955.
Decided March 11, 1955

Arthur Karger, Milton Boxer and Harry H. Lipsig for appellant.

Samuel Gottesman and Harold H. Wolgel for respondent.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: FULD, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑