New York Court of Appeals, 1955

Brannigan v. Terzakis

New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 23, 1955 · Concur: Conway

309 N.Y. 892; 131 N.E.2d 295

Opinion

309 N.Y. 892 (1955)

In the Matter of the Claim of James E. Brannigan, Respondent,
v.
Peter Terzakis, Doing Business as Metropolitan Painting and Decorating Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 13, 1955.Decided November 23, 1955

Paul F. Donohue for appellants.

Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Gilbert M. Landy, James O. Moore, Jr., and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Brannigan v. Terzakis

Opinion

In the Matter of the Claim of James E. Brannigan, Respondent,v.Peter Terzakis, Doing Business as Metropolitan Painting and Decorating Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

In the Matter of the Claim of James E. Brannigan, Respondent,
v.
Peter Terzakis, Doing Business as Metropolitan Painting and Decorating Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.