Oxford Group-Moral Re-Armament, MRA, Inc. v. Sweet
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Society of Holy Child Jesus v. City of Summit (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2011)
- Eternal Flame of Hope Ministries, Inc. v. King (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Legion of Christ, Inc. v. Town of Mount Pleasant (N.Y. 2004)
- United States Columbarium Co. v. Tax Commission (New York Supreme Court 1959)
- Matter of First United Methodist Church in Flushing v. Assessor, Town of Callicoon (N.Y. 2025)
- Matter of First United Methodist Church in Flushing v. Assessor, Town of Callicoon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Congregation Ateres Yisroel v. Town of Ramapo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Community Humanitarian Assn., Inc. v. Town of Ramapo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Ahavas Chaverim Gemilas Chesed, Inc. v. Town of Mamakating (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Ahavas Chaverim Gemilas Chesed, Inc. v. Town of Mamakating (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Eternal Flame of Hope Ministries, Inc. v. King (N.Y. 2011)
- Congregation Or Yosef v. Town of Ramapo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Legion of Christ, Inc. v. Town of Mount Pleasant (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Colella v. Board of Assessors (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Oxford Group-Moral Re-Armament, MRA, Inc. v. Sweet (N.Y. 1955)
- Oxford Group-Moral Re-Armament, MRA, Inc. v. Sweet (N.Y. 1955)
- Community Synagogue v. Bates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1955)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Orders of the Appellate Division reversed and those of Special Term reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the ground that the weight of the evidence supports the findings of the Official Referee that the premises of the appellant in both towns are used exclusively for exempt purposes, but that appellant is not a “ family ” or a “ church or other place of worship ”, so as to conform to the zoning ordinance of the Town of New Castle. We have considered the other points raised and conclude that the Official Referee reached the correct result. No opinion.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voobhis and Burke, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.