New York Court of Appeals, 1958

MATTER OF HOTALING v. Hurd

New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 25, 1958

4 N.Y.2d 979; 152 N.E.2d 526

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

O'Neill v. Pfau (New York Supreme Court 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

4 N.Y.2d 979 (1958)

In the Matter of Mae E. Hotaling, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v.
T. Norman Hurd, as Director of the Budget of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 12, 1958.Decided June 25, 1958.

John J. Kelly, Jr., and John T. De Graff for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Milton Alpert and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Cases that cite this one

Opinion

In the Matter of Mae E. Hotaling, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant,v.T. Norman Hurd, as Director of the Budget of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

In the Matter of Mae E. Hotaling, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v.
T. Norman Hurd, as Director of the Budget of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.