Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1960

Verduce v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

Verduce v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 10, 1960
8 N.Y.2d 928; 168 N.E.2d 838
Verduce v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

8 N.Y.2d 928 (1960)

Rosalie A. Verduce et al., Appellants,
v.
Board of Higher Education in the City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 23, 1960.
Decided June 10, 1960.

Benjamin H. Siff and Lester Lewis Jay for appellants.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein, Seymour B. Quel and Stanley Katz of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and FOSTER. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. On the particular facts of this case, and for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division, issues of fact were presented which should have been submitted to a jury. No opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.