Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges
Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges
9 N.Y.2d 747; 174 N.E.2d 533
Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fitld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Judge Burke dissents in the following memorandum: The complaint states a cause of action for services performed but any recovery must be limited to the value of services rendered by Siegel alone. I do not think that Special Term and the majority are correct in holding that Siegel can bring an action in his individual capacity.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.