Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

New York Court of Appeals
Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm, 12 N.Y.2d 940 (N.Y. 1963)
188 N.E.2d 790

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

Opinion of the Court

Orders affirmed, without costs. The questions certified on the appeal and the cross appeal answered in the affirmative. Ho opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Foster and Scileppi. Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to modify and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that *943under the applicable statute criminal liability is the exclusive redress for its violation (Sajor v. Ampol, Inc., 275 N. Y. 125; Rosasco Creameries v. Cohen, 276 N. Y. 274). The question certified on the cross appeal to this court should be answered in the negative.

Reference

Full Case Name
Samuel Atkin, Appellants-Respondents v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
Cited By
11 cases
Status
Published