New York Court of Appeals, 1963

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 23, 1963
12 N.Y.2d 940; 188 N.E.2d 790
Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Orders affirmed, without costs. The questions certified on the appeal and the cross appeal answered in the affirmative. Ho opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Foster and Scileppi. Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to modify and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that *943under the applicable statute criminal liability is the exclusive redress for its violation (Sajor v. Ampol, Inc., 275 N. Y. 125; Rosasco Creameries v. Cohen, 276 N. Y. 274). The question certified on the cross appeal to this court should be answered in the negative.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.