Brooks v. Board of Education
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Yarborough v. City University of New York (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1987)
- Lindaman v. Vestal Central School District (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Snyder v. Morristown Central School District No. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Tepper v. City of New Rochelle School District (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Hauser v. South Orangetown Central School District No. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1975)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Scileppi dissents in the following memorandum, in which Judge Fuld concurs.
Dissenting Opinion
I cannot agree with the majority that defendant Board of Education breached a duty to provide an adequate degree of general supervision over student activities.
The infant plaintiff was injured in a school gymnasium while engaging in an exercise in the basic skills of the game of soccer, under the supervision of a physical education teacher. Groups of boys were placed on both sides of the gymnasium. Each boy
The Board of Education may be found negligent in the case of injury to a piipil if a teacher fails to properly and adequately supervise athletic activities or to exercise reasonable care to prevent injury, or if he assigns pupils to exercises which are beyond their abilities. In this case the object of the exercise permitted by the teacher was to develop a skill in approaching and kicking a soccer ball under simulated game conditions and not to block or knock down the other person. Consequently, it is my view that no basis exists for a finding that the exercise was dangerous or that the alleged mismatching of the two boys constituted negligence.
I would reverse the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.