Claim of Post v. Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp.
Claim of Post v. Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp.
14 N.Y.2d 796; 200 N.E.2d 213; 251 N.Y.S.2d 32; 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1094
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Lujan-Espinzo v. Electrical Illuminations by Arnold Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Anslinger v. Wallace (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1973)
- Matter of Ferra v. Paramount Global (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Matter of Ramales v. Frank & Nino's Pizza Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Claim of Thompson v. Wiltsie Construction Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Claim of Smith v. LSI Lighting Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Claim of Villapol v. American Landmark Management (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Claim of Derello v. Wyndham Poughkeepsie Hotel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Claim of Milz v. J & R Amusement Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Claim of Mikolajczyk v. New York State Department of Transportation (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1976)
- Claim of Loucks v. Joy Automatics (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Burke. Judges Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that as a matter of law decedent met his death solely as a result of intoxication. Taking no part: Judge Bregan.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.