MATTER OF MATTY'S REST. INC. v. New York State Liquor Auth.
MATTER OF MATTY'S REST. INC. v. New York State Liquor Auth.
15 N.Y.2d 659; 204 N.E.2d 205; 255 N.Y.S.2d 875; 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 799
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- 53089 Martina Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Matter of Galaxy Bar & Grill Corp. v. New York State Liq. Auth. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- 512-3rd St., Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- RSSM, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- R & J Farms, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Realmuto v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Fabulous Steak House, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Stanwood Pub, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- A & R Entertainment, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- Circus Disco Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority (N.Y. 1980)
- G.J. & S. Pizza, Inc. v. McLaughlin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1980)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In the Matter of Matty's Rest. Inc., Respondent,
v.
New York State Liquor Authority, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Bartholomew A. Moynahan, Hyman Amsel and Emanuel D. Black for appellant.
David J. Eisenberg and Max D. Krongold for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.