New York Court of Appeals, 1964

Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc.

Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 23, 1964
13 N.Y.2d 1163; 196 N.E.2d 737
Claim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

*1165Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that it is barred, as matter of law, by section 40 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.