New York Court of Appeals, 1964

People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay

People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 23, 1964
13 N.Y.2d 1178; 197 N.E.2d 543
People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his absence from the courtroom during the argument of a motion respecting whether the jury should continue its deliberation or be discharged violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights had not been violated. [See 13 N Y 2d 253.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.