Palm v. City of New York
Palm v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the following memorandum: The trial court instructed the jury that violation by appellant of the New York City Health Code (art. 153, § 153.19) would be “ some evidence of negligence ”. This was error (City of Rochester v. Campbell, 123 N. Y. 405; see Steitz v. City of Beacon, 295 N. Y. 51, 56) since it could be taken by the jury
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fund, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Quintina Palm v. City of New York, and New York City Housing Authority
- Status
- Published