New York Court of Appeals, 1965

MATTER OF NEW YORK CITY HOUS. & REDEVELOPMENT BD. v. Foley

MATTER OF NEW YORK CITY HOUS. & REDEVELOPMENT BD. v. Foley
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 1, 1965
16 N.Y.2d 1071; 213 N.E.2d 686
MATTER OF NEW YORK CITY HOUS. & REDEVELOPMENT BD. v. Foley

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

16 N.Y.2d 1071 (1965)

In the Matter of the New York City Housing and Redevelopment Board, Appellant,
v.
Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
In the Matter of Amalia V. Betanzos et al., Appellants,
v.
Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 25, 1965.
Decided December 1, 1965.

Sol A. Liebman for New York City Housing and Redevelopment Board, appellant.

Edward Robin for Amalia V. Betanzos and others, appellants.

Charles F. Preusse, William T. Farley and Ansley Kime for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Incorporated, respondent.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel (Rose Schneph of counsel), for Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, respondent.

Norman Marcus for New York City Planning Commission, amicus curiๆ.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.