New York Court of Appeals, 1965

In Re the Estate of Jaret

In Re the Estate of Jaret
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 30, 1965
17 N.Y.2d 450; 213 N.E.2d 889; 266 N.Y.S.2d 809; 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 932

In Re the Estate of Jaret

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Bergan. Judge Scileppi dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum in which Judge Fuld concurs: The language of the will and codicils does not contain a clear and unambiguous direction against apportionment of taxes on all legacies (Matter of Pepper, 307 N. Y. 242). However, since such a direction is present concerning taxes due on the bequests preceding article Fourth (including the bequest to the wife in the third codicil which amended article Third of the will), taxes on these legacies should be paid out of the actual residuary estate. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, for proceedings not inconsistent with this memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.