Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1965

Claim of Uletas v. Elliott

Claim of Uletas v. Elliott
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 27, 1965
16 N.Y.2d 642; 209 N.E.2d 120; 261 N.Y.S.2d 79; 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1335

Claim of Uletas v. Elliott

Opinion of the Court

*644Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim on the dissenting memorandum of Justice Herlihy in the first appeal to the Appellate Division (18 A D 2d 849). Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑