Claim of Uletas v. Elliott

New York Court of Appeals
Claim of Uletas v. Elliott, 16 N.Y.2d 642 (N.Y. 1965)
209 N.E.2d 120; 261 N.Y.S.2d 79; 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1335

Claim of Uletas v. Elliott

Opinion of the Court

*644Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim on the dissenting memorandum of Justice Herlihy in the first appeal to the Appellate Division (18 A D 2d 849). Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of the Claim of Peter Uletas v. William Elliott, Workmen's Compensation Board
Status
Published