New York Court of Appeals, 1965

People v. Peskin

People v. Peskin
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 27, 1965
16 N.Y.2d 659; 209 N.E.2d 283; 261 N.Y.S.2d 291; 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1347

People v. Peskin

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted only to the following extent: Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Defendant argued that his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States were violated in that he was *660arrested for selling obscene photographs without the material having first been submitted by the police officer to a court for judicial determination. The Court of Appeals held that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 16 N Y 2d 511.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.