Schuman v. Hertz Corp.

New York Court of Appeals
Schuman v. Hertz Corp., 17 N.Y.2d 604 (N.Y. 1966)
215 N.E.2d 683; 268 N.Y.S.2d 563; 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1558

Schuman v. Hertz Corp.

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings. The record before us indicates that the dismissal of the original suit was not intended by the Justice presiding to be a dismissal for neglect to prosecute. We call particular attention to the fact that the same Justice who dismissed the original action also denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this complaint on the grounds that the original one had not been dismissed for neglect *606to prosecute. Since this action was timely commenced, it is within the saving provisions of CPLR 205.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating concur.

Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ruth Schuman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Henry Schuman v. Hertz Corporation
Cited By
11 cases
Status
Published