New York Court of Appeals, 1966

Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.

Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided September 29, 1966 · Appears, Bergan, Burke, Business, Desmond, Fuld, Gray, Ground, Journey, Keating, Matter, Object, Occurred, Outlined, Overruled, Prompted, Scileppi, Stern, Sufficient, That, Upon, Voorhis
18 N.Y.2d 738; 274 N.Y.S.2d 347; 221 N.E.2d 172; 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1107
Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DesmoNd and Judges Fuld, Burke, Scileppi and Keating. Judge VAN Voorhis concurs upon the following ground: The requirement outlined in the opinion of Matter of Marks v. Gray (251 N. Y. 90) that the business errand should have prompted the trip appears to have been overruled in Matter of Mahoney v. Stern & Co. (9 N Y 2d 931), which holds that it is sufficient if the journey on which the accident occurred was to serve both a business and a private object. Taking no part: Judge BergaN.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.