New York Court of Appeals, 1966

In re the Estate of Imperato

New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 27, 1966 · Bergan, Bubice, Desmond, Fuld, Keating, Scileppi, Voorhis

18 N.Y.2d 825; 222 N.E.2d 394; 275 N.Y.S.2d 530; 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1027

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

In re the Estate of Kronen (N.Y. 1986)
In re Cincotta (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
In re Cincotta (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
In re the Estate of Shannon (New York Surrogate's Court 1992)
In re Tantillo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
In re Culeton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
In re the Estate of Rutherford (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
In re the Estate of Kronen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
Margulis v. Teichman (New York Surrogate's Court 1984)
In re the Estate of Bromley (New York Surrogate's Court 1976)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order reversed and decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division to both parties payable out of the estate. The dis-positive provisions of the will were limited by the conditions set forth in the fourth paragraph thereof. Accordingly, the determination of the Surrogate is reinstated for the reasons stated in his opinion (44 Misc 2d 639).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van VooRhis, Bubice, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.