People v. Teams

New York Court of Appeals October 27, 1966

People v. Teams, 18 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1966)

222 N.E.2d 603; 275 N.Y.S.2d 841; 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1033

Beegan, Burke, Desmond, Fuld, Herewith, Keating, McQueen, Question, Reach, Scileppi, Upon, Voorhis, Vote

Opinion of the Court

*837Memorandum. The evidence taken from the defendant at the place of his arrest was properly received in evidence (see People v. Peters, 18 N Y 2d 238; People v. Rivera, 14 N Y 2d 441; People v. Santiago, 13 N Y 2d 326, 334). The prearraignment statements made by the defendant were properly received in evidence (People v. Meyer, 11 N Y 2d 162; cf. People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72, 77). Miranda v. Arizona (384 U. S. 436) is not applicable (People v. McQueen, 18 N Y 2d 337, decided herewith).

Judges Van VooRhis, Burke, Scileppi, Beegan and Keating concur in Memorandum; Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Fuld dissent and vote to reverse upon the dissenting opinion in People v. McQueen (18 N Y 2d 337, decided herewith) and reach no other question.

Upon reargument: Judgment affirmed in a Memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name: The People of the State of New York v. James Teams
Status: Published