New York Court of Appeals, 1966

In re the Estate of Zeh

New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 29, 1966 · Authority, Bergan, Burke, Desmond, Fuld, Keating, Ludwig, Mottek, Scileppi, Upon, Vetzigian, Voorhis, Vote

18 N.Y.2d 900; 223 N.E.2d 43; 276 N.Y.S.2d 635; 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 972

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Adkins Ex Rel. Uccelli v. Oppio (Nev. 1989)
Dannhardt v. Donnelly (District Court, E.D. New York 1985)
In re the Estate of Wierzbieniec (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
In re the Estate of Florio (New York Surrogate's Court 1999)
In re the Estate of Lubins (New York Surrogate's Court 1997)
In re the Estate of Mangiacavallo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
In re Di Siena (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
In re the Estate of Bainer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1979)
In re the Estate of Hassan (New York Surrogate's Court 1979)
Glass v. Battista (N.Y. 1978)
Estate of Aquilino v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, upon the opinion at the Appellate Division, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Concur; Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Van Voorhis, Bergan and Keating. Judges Fuld, Burke and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse upon the authority of Hermann v. Ludwig (229 N. Y. 544); Tutunjian v. Vetzigian (299 N. Y. 315); Rich v. Mottek (11 N Y 2d 90).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.