Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

New York Court of Appeals December 30, 1966

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm, 18 N.Y.2d 980 (N.Y. 1966)

224 N.E.2d 723; 278 N.Y.S.2d 216; 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 907

Been, Bergan, Broker, Burke, Clearly, Dealers, Desmond, Evidenced, Fuld, Keating, Offered, Over, Plaintiffs, Public, Quotations, Sale, Sales, Scileppi, Sheets, State, Stock, Than, That, Upon, Voolhis, Year

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the majority opinion at the Appellate Division; no opinion.

'Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voolhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Keating concurs in the result upon the ground that the stock had been ‘ ‘ offered to the public in this state ” more than one year before the first sale to plaintiffs. This is evidenced by three actual sales in 1957 and, even more clearly, by quotations of the stock in the ‘ ‘ pink sheets ’ ’ of over-the-counter quotations available to broker-dealers.

Reference

Full Case Name: Samuel Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published