New York Court of Appeals, 1966

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 30, 1966 · Been, Bergan, Broker, Burke, Clearly, Dealers, Desmond, Evidenced, Fuld, Keating, Offered, Over, Plaintiffs, Public, Quotations, Sale, Sales, Scileppi, Sheets, State, Stock, Than, That, Upon, Voolhis, Year
18 N.Y.2d 980; 224 N.E.2d 723; 278 N.Y.S.2d 216; 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 907
Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the majority opinion at the Appellate Division; no opinion.

'Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voolhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Keating concurs in the result upon the ground that the stock had been ‘ ‘ offered to the public in this state ” more than one year before the first sale to plaintiffs. This is evidenced by three actual sales in 1957 and, even more clearly, by quotations of the stock in the ‘ ‘ pink sheets ’ ’ of over-the-counter quotations available to broker-dealers.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.