New York Court of Appeals, 1966

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 30, 1966 · Been, Bergan, Broker, Burke, Clearly, Dealers, Desmond, Evidenced, Fuld, Keating, Offered, Over, Plaintiffs, Public, Quotations, Sale, Sales, Scileppi, Sheets, State, Stock, Than, That, Upon, Voolhis, Year

18 N.Y.2d 980; 224 N.E.2d 723; 278 N.Y.S.2d 216; 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 907

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the majority opinion at the Appellate Division; no opinion.

'Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voolhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Keating concurs in the result upon the ground that the stock had been ‘ ‘ offered to the public in this state ” more than one year before the first sale to plaintiffs. This is evidenced by three actual sales in 1957 and, even more clearly, by quotations of the stock in the ‘ ‘ pink sheets ’ ’ of over-the-counter quotations available to broker-dealers.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.