People v. Carter
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Stein (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Webster v. Farmer (Oswego City Court 1987)
- People v. James (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Childress (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- In re Hebrew S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Anzalone (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- People v. Chacon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- People v. Kirkwood (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- In re Moises O. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Lopez (N.Y. 1992)
- People v. Blackwell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- People v. Diaz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- People v. Wilson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- People v. Lynch (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. White (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Williams (N.Y. 1989)
- People v. Beauchamp (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Bloomfield (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Delaney (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Sweeney (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Womble (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Supino (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
- People v. Restifo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1976)
- People v. Sim (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed in the following memorandum. The complainant paid $3,300 for his automobile 10 months prior to its theft. Under the circumstances of this case, such evidence sufficiently established that market value of the automobile was in excess of $500. We have considered the other contentions advanced by defendant and find them without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Soileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.