In re the Arbitration between Vogel & Lewis
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mark R. Switz, Inc. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1979)
- TJI Realty, Inc. v. Harris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- Schachter v. Kulik (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Weinberg v. G.S.W. Realty Corp. (New York Supreme Court 1982)
- Ellenberg v. Schneider (New York Supreme Court 1981)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. We neither consider nor pass upon the merits of the dispute to be arbitrated. We decide only that, when viewed against the factual background of the case, the arbitration clause contained in the agreement between the parties encompasses the controversy which has arisen and that such controversy is a proper subject for arbitration. As directed in Special Term’s order of August 16, 1965, “ the arbitration * * * shall proceed forthwith in accordance with the agreement ”.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitbl.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.