Hunting v. Power
Cases that cite this one
43 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Harden v. Board of Elections (N.Y. 1989)
- Farrell v. Sunderland (New York Supreme Court 1997)
- MATTER OF PLUNKETT v. Mahoney (N.Y. 1990)
- Weingarten v. D'Apice (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Matter of Trevisani v. Karp (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Griffin v. Torres (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Griffin v. Torres (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Matter of Stevens v. Collins (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- MatterofSloanvKellner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Sloan v. Kellner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Sloan v. Kellner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Hall v. Dussault (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Hall v. Dussault (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Landry v. Mansion (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Tully v. Ketover (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Green v. DiNapoli (New York Supreme Court 2001)
- Bee v. Sabbeth (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Pasquerella v. Sunderland (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- McCall v. Hynes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Winn v. Washington County Board of Elections (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Proud v. Relin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Plunkett v. Mahoney (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Venezia v. Albanese (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Del Vecchio v. Pierro (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Quaglia v. Lefever (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum. The evident purpose of section 149 of the Election Law is to dispense with primary balloting when there is a candidate or slate without opposition. Because of the failure of the only pending designation, the court was empowered under section 330 of the Election Law to make an appropriate order as justice required, namely, to direct the board of elections to provide blank ballots in the pending primary, the intention having been manifested to nominate some candidate.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Keating and Breitel. Judges Scileppi and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum:' The statute (Election Law, § 148) lays down specific conditions under which the opportunity to write in the name of a candidate in a primary election is afforded. Concededly, those conditions are not met in this case, and the order is thus without statutory support.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.