People ex rel. Hinckley v. Tutuska
New York Court of Appeals
People ex rel. Hinckley v. Tutuska, 20 N.Y.2d 752 (N.Y. 1967)
229 N.E.2d 710; 283 N.Y.S.2d 117; 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1344
People ex rel. Hinckley v. Tutuska
Opinion of the Court
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether appellants’ rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated. Relators contended that their arrest and proposed extradition were improper because the criminal complaint from the demanding State (Arizona) did not furnish the Governor of New York with “probable cause” for relators’ arrest. The Court of Appeals held that the constitutional rights of appellants had not been violated. [See 20 N Y 2d 684.]
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The People of the State of New York ex rel. Eugene R. Hinckley and Jeanette Hinckley v. B. John Tutuska, as Sheriff of the County of Erie
- Status
- Published