Coyle v. Gabel

New York Court of Appeals
Coyle v. Gabel, 21 N.Y.2d 808 (N.Y. 1968)
235 N.E.2d 775; 288 N.Y.S.2d 636; 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1612

Coyle v. Gabel

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent, in the following memorandum: The Administrator was not bound by the doctrine of res judicata to hold that 206 Warren Street was decontrolled. The 1943 registration was a mere unilateral declaration and it *810was not an adjudication of anything. It is our opinion, however, that the Administrator’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Amorelli v. Berman, 19 N Y 2d 960).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Beroan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of James J. Coyle, Jr. v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, and Arthur Goodman, Intervenor
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published