New York Court of Appeals, 1968

Whitley v. Pacific Industries, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 5, 1968

22 N.Y.2d 726; 292 N.Y.S.2d 112; 239 N.E.2d 207; 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1324

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Leo A. Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corporation (2d Cir. 1980)
Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp. (2d Cir. 1980)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

*728Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Breitel. Judges Keating and Jasen dissent in part and vote to reverse and deny the motion for summary judgment in favor of the corporate defendant, Pacific Industries, Inc., in the following memorandum: We agree with the majority that plaintiff’s affidavits are insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the individual defendants. As to the corporate defendant, however, issues are sufficiently stated to require a trial as to whether plaintiff’s employment was one terminable at will.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.