New York Court of Appeals, 1968

Wallace v. Murphy

Wallace v. Murphy
New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 2, 1968
22 N.Y.2d 879; 239 N.E.2d 922; 293 N.Y.S.2d 339; 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1207

Wallace v. Murphy

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: In the Court of Appeals petitioner argued that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States he was entitled to a fair hearing, including notice of the charge against him. The Court of Appeals found that petitioner did in fact have notice of the charge and held, therefore, that his constitutional rights were not violated. [See 21 N Y 2d 433.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.