Schwartz v. MACROSE LUMBER & TRIM CO., INC.
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation (District Court, S.D. New York 1992)
- Roshan L. Mehra, as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels and Credits Which Were of Rajinder K. Mehra v. Roberta Bentz and Rudolph J. Bentz (2d Cir. 1976)
- Chisholm v. JR SIMPLOT COMPANY (Idaho 1972)
- Wyandotte Industries v. E.Y. Neill & Co. (In re First Hartford Corp.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 1986)
- Computerized Radiological Services, Inc. v. Syntex Corp. (District Court, E.D. New York 1984)
- Antilles Shipping Co. v. Texaco, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1970)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Paul Schwartz, Appellant,
v.
Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Samuel G. Rabinor, Sidney H. Bishop and Albert S. Dranoff for plaintiff-appellant.
Walter Feller and E. Edan Spencer for respondents-appellants.
Michael I. Begun, Murray H. Paloger and Henry B. Raff for third-party defendant-respondent-appellant.
Roger G. McTiernan and Michael R. Treanor for defendant-respondent and third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and JASEN. Judges KEATING and BREITEL dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion at Trial Term, but to grant a new trial.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.