Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

In re the Accounting of Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.

New York Court of Appeals
In re the Accounting of Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., 25 N.Y.2d 681 (N.Y. 1969)

In re the Accounting of Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur denied. The issues tendered and basing the motion to amend remittitur are not substantial and were not raised until appellants’ motion to reargue in this *682court. A motion to amend remittitur has been denied where the constitutional issue tendered is patently insubstantial and where the constitutional issue was not raised until motion for reargument (People v. Rosario, 308 N. Y. 769; People v. Keshner, 305 N. Y. 553; but see People v. Coleman, 10 N Y 2d 1008). See, however, People v. Kelly (304 N. Y. 798) involving different constitutional issues raised on the main appeal and on motion for reargument. [See 25 N Y 2d 163.]

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of the Accounting of Chemical Bank New York Trust Company, as Surviving Cotrustee of the Trust under the Will of Chance M. Vought, Harold Brown, Appellants Chemical Bank New York Trust Company, as Surviving Cotrustee, Respondent Alexander Halpern, as of Chance M. Vought Jr.
Status
Published
↑