New York Court of Appeals, 1969

Blake v. Hogan

Blake v. Hogan
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 2, 1969
25 N.Y.2d 747; 250 N.E.2d 568; 303 N.Y.S.2d 505; 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1229
Blake v. Hogan

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The record, in our view, supports the conclusion — reached by the Appellate Division when it denied the petitioners-appellants ’ motion in the criminal case to dismiss the indictment —that there had been no denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial in view of the fact that they had acquiesced in the delay complained of. On the procedural issue, we do not believe that the extraordinary remedy of prohibition is proper under the circumstances of this case.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitbl and Jasen concur.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.