Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Roskin Distributors, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLP (Ill. App. Ct. 2010)
- Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLP (Ill. App. Ct. 2010)
- In re Elsa Designs, Ltd. (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 1993)
- Sterling Fifth Associates v. Carpentille Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Bernstein v. Kazemi & Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- X.L.O. Concrete Corp. v. Rivergate Corp. (N.Y. 1994)
- Fellerman & Cohen Realty Corp. v. Clinical Plus Inc. (In re Hirschhorn) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York 1993)
- TDK Electronics Corp. v. M & A Enterprises (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- DeFilippis v. Perez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Yauchler v. Bailey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Wenz v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Kahn v. Friedlander (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- Gonyea v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- Allied Building & Airport Services, Inc. v. 101-103 Park Avenue, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1976)
- Williams Real Estate Co. v. Solow Development Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1975)
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rubenfeld (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1975)
- Otis Elevator Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc. (New York Supreme Court 1975)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*561 Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The Appellate Division was correct in dismissing the fourth affirmative defense and first counterclaim on the ground that the agreement relied upon did not satisfy the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law, § 15-301, subd. 1). That part of the Appellate Division order which dismissed the second, third and sixth affirmative defenses is not final within the meaning of the Constitution and, therefore, not reviewable by this court. (See, e.g., Tjepkema v. Kenney, 24 N Y 2d 942; Markowitz v. Fein, 23 N Y 2d 800; see, also, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, p. 161.)
Concur: Chief Judge Ftjld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Taking no part: Judge Burke.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.