MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. Weidy
MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. Weidy
28 N.Y.2d 564; 268 N.E.2d 324
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Claim of Gregorec v. Brenners Furniture Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Claim of Hantz v. Brightman Agency (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Claim of Jones v. HSBC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Claim of Martin v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Amedeo Ammirata, Respondent,
v.
Harry Weidy et al., Respondents, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
John M. Cullen for appellant.
Anne G. Kafka for respondents.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.
Order affirmed, with costs, to respondents employer and carrier; no opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.