MATTER OF WE'RE ASSOCS. CO. v. Bear
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Town of Bedford v. Village of Mount Kisco (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1972)
- Headriver v. Town Board of Riverhead (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- 208 East 30th Street Corp. v. Town of North Salem (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- Bloom v. Town Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- Bloom v. Town Board of Yorktown (New York Supreme Court 1980)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In the Matter of We're Associates Company, Respondent,
v.
Franklin Bear et al., Constituting the Nassau County Planning Commission, Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.)
In the Matter of the Town of North Hempstead, Respondent,
v.
Franklin Bear et al., Constituting the Nassau County Planning Commission, Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Joseph Jaspan, County Attorney (Benedict F. Romano and F. Stuart Darrow of counsel), for appellants.
Stephen Van R. Ulman for We're Associates Company, respondent.
Francis F. Doran, Town Attorney (Gino Papa of counsel), for Town of North Hempstead, respondent.
Pratt, Caemmerer & Cleary for Incorporated Villages of Brookville, North Hills, Old Westbury and Roslyn Harbor, amici curiae.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.
Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.