New York Court of Appeals, 1971

Kent v. City of Buffalo

Kent v. City of Buffalo
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 18, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 818; 277 N.E.2d 669; 327 N.Y.S.2d 653; 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 955
Kent v. City of Buffalo

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, without costs, and the complaint dismissed in the following memorandum: We approve the rationale of the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division and write only to note that upon application of the rule of Rosenbloom v. Metro-media (403 U. S. 29, 52), decided subsequent to the Appellate Division decision, we find the evidence too insubstantial to constitute “ clear and convincing proof that the defamatory falsehood was published with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” (and see Frink v. McEldowney, 29 N Y 2d 720).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Soileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.