Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corp. v. Forbes, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals
Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corp. v. Forbes, Inc., 30 N.Y.2d 595 (N.Y. 1972)
282 N.E.2d 118; 331 N.Y.S.2d 29; 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1458

Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corp. v. Forbes, Inc.

Concurring Opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff has failed to state any evidentiary facts, warranting a trial, to support its allegation that the defendant was motivated by malice in publishing its critique of the plaintiff’s restaurant. (See, e.g., Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., 403 U. S. 29; New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254; Frink v. McEldowney, 29 N Y 2d 720; Kent v. City of Buffalo, 29 N Y 2d 818.)

Reference

Full Case Name
Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corporation v. Forbes, Inc.
Cited By
18 cases
Status
Published