Schwartz v. Bogen
New York Court of Appeals
Schwartz v. Bogen, 30 N.Y.2d 648 (N.Y. 1972)
282 N.E.2d 623; 331 N.Y.S.2d 669; 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1434
Schwartz v. Bogen
Concurring Opinion
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gtbson.
Opinion of the Court
Because this court’s remittitur is involved the court retains inherent jurisdiction to review its enforcement, irrespective of the rules of nonfinality applicable to contempt orders in other contexts (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, p. 37, n. 1; cf. New York Thruway Auth. v. State of New York, 25 N Y 2d 210, 219, dispensing with the need for leave to appeal in such case). On the merits, the order should be affirmed as the courts below exercised their discretion properly in refusing to hold respondents in contempt.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of Dorothy H. Schwartz v. Isidore Bogen, Constituting the Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York
- Status
- Published