Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. State
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kramer ex rel. estate of Chin v. Chin (In re Chin) (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York 2013)
- Onanuga v. Pfizer, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2005)
- State of NY v. SCA Services, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1999)
- Town of Oyster Bay v. Occidental Chemical Corp. (District Court, E.D. New York 1997)
- National Bank of Canada v. Artex Industries, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz;: Whether lack of a remedy in one proceeding rather than two to declare the licensing statute invalid and also to obtain a refund of licensing fees already paid violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals considered this issue and held that there was no denial of claimant’s constitutional rights (30 N Y 2d 415).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.