Greiss v. Royal National Bank
Greiss v. Royal National Bank
31 N.Y.2d 1003; 293 N.E.2d 827; 341 N.Y.S.2d 453; 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1488
Greiss v. Royal National Bank
Opinion of the Court
Order modified, with costs to plaintiff-respondent, in accordance with the following memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed: The order appealed from should be modified by striking the award of punitive damages. The conduct complained of; hot “aimed at the public generally,” was neither “ so ‘ gross [nor] wanton ’ as to bring it within the class of malfeasances, for which punitive damages may be awarded.” (James v. Powell, 19 N Y 2d 249, 260; see, also, Vinlis Constr. Co. v. Roreck, 27 N Y 2d 687, 689; cf. Walker v. Sheldon, 10 N Y 2d 401, 406.)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.