Greiss v. Royal National Bank

New York Court of Appeals
Greiss v. Royal National Bank, 31 N.Y.2d 1003 (N.Y. 1973)
293 N.E.2d 827; 341 N.Y.S.2d 453; 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1488

Greiss v. Royal National Bank

Opinion of the Court

Order modified, with costs to plaintiff-respondent, in accordance with the following memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed: The order appealed from should be modified by striking the award of punitive damages. The conduct complained of; hot “aimed at the public generally,” was neither “ so ‘ gross [nor] wanton ’ as to bring it within the class of malfeasances, for which punitive damages may be awarded.” (James v. Powell, 19 N Y 2d 249, 260; see, also, Vinlis Constr. Co. v. Roreck, 27 N Y 2d 687, 689; cf. Walker v. Sheldon, 10 N Y 2d 401, 406.)

*1005Concur: Chief Judge Fulo and Judges Burke, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Taking no part: Judge Breitel.

Reference

Full Case Name
Florence Greiss, as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis Greiss v. Royal National Bank et Ano., and Harry Weinberg
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published