Elliott v. Galvin
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kettaneh v. Board of Standards & Appeals (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Kisil v. City of Sandusky (Ohio 1984)
- Croissant v. Zoning Board of Appeals (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- Foster v. Saylor (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1981)
- 215 East 72nd Street Corp. v. Klein (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1977)
- Envoy Towers Co. v. Klein (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order reversed, without costs, and the judgment of Special Term reinstated in the following memorandum: The record supports the finding that the location of the zoning lot within two different zoning districts, as well as the irregular shape and small size of the 01-9 portion of the zoning lot constitute such ‘1 unique physical conditions ’ ’ which allow the granting of & variance within the meaning of section 72-21 of the New York City Zoning Resolution. The record also discloses that the Board of Standards and Appeals has made all of the other findings required of it by section 72-21 of the New York City Zoning Resolution, and we conclude that these findings are not arbitrary or contrary to law.
Concur: Judges Burke, Jasen, Gabrielli and Wachtler. Judge Jones dissents and votes to affirm upon the ground that there is no basis, on the record in this case, for a finding of the prerequisite ‘1 unique physical conditions ” as to this property. Taking no part: Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Breitel.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.